Mallard finds the idea of life without her husband liberating. While this does not in any way imply that Brently was anything other than a loving husband, she relishes the thought of being able to live life on her own terms. She feels excited about a life with no one to answer to but herself.
She is shocked into silent disbelief, overcome with emotion, struck with a sense of relief at being free from the burden of marriage. Like any ordinary women, she is a normal housewife who depends on her husband.
Mallard felt stuck with no power and desired to become a widow because a widow had almost as much power as a man. When her sister announces that Brently has died, Louise cries dramatically rather than feeling numb, as she knows many other women would. She weeps, then retires to her room to be alone.
While she is in the room, she looks out the window and begins to notice all of the blooming life outside her home. Then she goes to her room to be by herself and locks the room. Inside the room, alone, she feels frightened of some knowledge that is coming to her. Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Extreme circumstances have given Louise a taste of this forbidden fruit, and her thoughts are, in turn, extreme.
She sees her life as being absolutely hers and her new independence as the core of her being. Overwhelmed, Louise even turns to prayer, hoping for a long life in which to enjoy this feeling. The forbidden joy disappears as quickly as it came, but the taste of it is enough to kill her. Chopin suggests that all marriages, even the kindest ones, are inherently oppressive. Louise, who readily admits that her husband was kind and loving, nonetheless feels joy when she believes that he has died.
New Q: Some students in my class think that Mrs. Is there any evidence that she did? A: If this were real life — if you knew Mrs. Mallard, if you had been a friend or a relative of hers, if you understood the way she thinks and watched the way she has been acting throughout her life, then maybe you could find some evidence to help you answer your question. One advantage of art — of a story, a film, a song, etc.
In this story, for example, we can see inside of Mrs. So a good story, a good work of art, is like a gift. It gives us something special. One disadvantage of art — of a story, a film, a song, etc.
Mallard than what we have in those words of the story. If Kate Chopin had written other stories about Mrs. Mallard in which she told us more about her life and what kind of person she is, then maybe we could better answer the question. But this is the only story in which Kate Chopin writes about Mrs. So we have to conclude that she did not. If Kate Chopin had wanted us to know that she did, then she would have told us that in the story. A: Thomas Bonner, Jr.
Xavier University of Louisiana offers this response:. Tina Rathborne sometimes spelled Rathbone or Rathbourne directed; she and Nancy Dyer wrote the script. I always felt that the story, if it has a specific setting, is closer to the St.
I have an old photocopy of the short story, which is obviously from a book, but no one I have talked to including librarians knows where it is from.
A: We have found no answer to this question. If you have useful information, would you contact us? The Complete Works of Kate Chopin. Edited by Per Seyersted. Kate Chopin: Complete Novels and Stories. Edited by Sandra Gilbert. New York: Library of America, Distel, Kristin M.
Body and Soul Free! Cambridge Scholars Publishing, , pp. Doloff, Steven. Berenji, Fahimeh Q.
0コメント